Hydra X · Proposal for Euroclear Group Strategy
A Neutral Post-Trade Platform for Private Credit
A proposal for Euroclear to build shared post-trade infrastructure for a $3 trillion market, with Hydra X as partner
v0.93 · First published October 2026 · Updated 13 October 2026 · Confidential
00 · Executive Summary
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Euroclear could build the post-trade infrastructure that private credit lacks, using Hydra X's technology and licences.
- Private credit has grown to about $3 trillion1. Most of its loans are bilateral and change hands through paperwork processed by each facility agent, with no market-wide ownership record or independent price. These gaps help explain why fund investors accept lock-ups of several years and why lenders who need to sell can face prices below par.
- Investors in semi-liquid private credit funds are asking to withdraw more than those funds allow, and regulators are asking for loan-level data2,3. We expect regulators to require shared post-trade infrastructure within two to three years. No institution yet operates such infrastructure across bilateral private credit.
- Lenders hesitate to route positions through a platform owned by a competitor. The operator would therefore need to be independent of every lender that uses it. Euroclear already settles and holds securities for banks that compete with one another, which is the position this role requires.
- We propose a platform of four modules: (a) a Digital Loan Registry on the Canton Network (Canton); (b) Primary Distribution; (c) Secondary Trading; and (d) Custody, Settlement and Lifecycle Management. Each module would extend into private credit a service that Euroclear already runs at scale.
- Hydra X would supply Canton-native technology for issuance, distribution, trading, custody and settlement, and its group holds the Singapore licences for each regulated activity, including a Recognised Market Operator (RMO) licence for secondary trading4. Euroclear Bank's Singapore branch can already deal and provide custody, but it would need a market operator licence and the technology to run the trading venue itself.
- We ask Euroclear to take three decisions together: (a) to pursue the project; (b) to set a Phase 1 budget; and (c) to engage Hydra X as its technology and licensing partner.
Section 01Private credit has outgrown the post-trade services that support it
01 · Market Scale
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Private credit has reached about $3 trillion, and its shared post-trade services still cover mainly syndicated loans.
$3tn
Private credit assets under management on Morgan Stanley's measure, which it expects to reach $5 trillion by 20291.
Morgan Stanley · 2025
~1%
Share of the market sold in secondary transactions in 2025, mostly fund interests and portfolios. Credit made up 6.2% of all private-market secondary volume5.
Evercore · July 2026
- Private credit has grown quickly, as banks moved middle-market lending to funds and large asset managers such as BlackRock entered the market.
- Since 2008, banks have moved much of their middle-market lending to private credit funds to meet capital rules. Banks had provided agency, settlement and record-keeping for those loans, and the funds now arrange those services themselves or through third-party agents.
- In the United States, the March 2026 re-proposal of the Basel III rules would slightly reduce capital requirements for the largest banks6.
- BlackRock completed its purchase of HPS Investment Partners on 1 July 20257. It now runs a private credit business with about $190 billion of client assets.
- Shared post-trade services cover broadly syndicated loans well, and they reach private credit only in part.
- S&P Global's ClearPar settles syndicated loan trades and has begun to settle private credit allocations8. Bloomberg supplies model-based prices for syndicated loans.
- Bilateral direct loans, much of European private credit and private credit in ASEAN have no market-wide record of who owns each loan.
02 · Why the Gap Persists
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Bespoke loan documents and lender habits keep secondary trading thin, and shared infrastructure with standard terms could address the first.
- Each bilateral loan agreement sets its own definitions, collateral package and transfer terms. Buyers therefore have to price and transfer every loan as a special case.
- A buyer takes a bilateral loan by assignment or novation. That needs the facility agent's consent and, depending on the loan agreement, the borrower's consent or notice to the borrower. The process takes weeks, against one day for a US corporate bond.
- Mortgages faced the same barrier before collateralised mortgage obligations, and leveraged loans faced it before collateralised loan obligations.
- In both markets, standard terms and shared settlement made secondary trading routine. The method for removing the barrier is therefore known.
- Three habits of lenders and borrowers add to the documentation barrier. Shared infrastructure would leave those habits in place.
- 1. Lenders hold their positions because one discounted sale would force them to mark down every similar loan in the portfolio.
- 2. Borrowers use consent rights to block transfers to creditors they do not want.
- 3. Relationship lenders avoid visible exits to protect their access to new loans from sponsors.
How a bilateral loan changes hands todayIllustrative
Each transfer passes through the facility agent and the borrower, so a loan takes weeks to settle where a bond takes one day.
Bilateral loan, by assignment or novation
1Trade agreedSeller and buyer agree the price
2Transfer documentsSeller and buyer sign the assignment agreement or transfer certificate
3ConsentsFacility agent approves the buyer, and the borrower consents or receives notice, as the loan agreement requires
4Transfer recordedFacility agent records the buyer as lender of record
5SettlementBuyer pays the seller on the transfer date
US corporate bond, for comparison
1Trade agreedSeller and buyer agree the price
2Settlement at the CSDBond and cash move together on T+1
Section 02Pressure for shared infrastructure is rising, and competing banks already trust Euroclear with their securities
03 · Why Now
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
We expect shared private credit infrastructure within two to three years, and its builder to run it for decades.
All three pressures are already visible in 2026.
- Investors in semi-liquid private credit funds are asking to withdraw more than those funds allow. Managers are weighing secondary sales to meet those requests, and shared infrastructure would need to be ready if those sales arrive5.
- In the first quarter of 2026, fund investors asked to redeem 9.3% of BlackRock's HLEND fund and 10.9% of Morgan Stanley's North Haven fund2. Both funds limit redemptions to 5% a quarter.
- Managers of funds raised between 2018 and 2021 are selling portfolios to return cash before those funds reach the end of their terms5.
- Regulators are asking for more data on private credit. An institution that builds before any mandate could set the standard that later entrants follow.
- The Financial Stability Board (FSB) called in May 2026 for consistent loan-level data and common definitions3.
- Euroclear already runs its Digital Financial Market Infrastructure (D-FMI), which carried about €1.2 billion of digital issuance in 20259.
- An institution that builds only after a mandate could have to implement a standard that a competitor or a regulator had already written.
- Several of the largest asset managers are building their own operating platforms. If those platforms reach scale first, the market would split into competing proprietary standards.
- Lenders would then have to connect to platforms run by their competitors, which many are reluctant to do.
Redemption requests at two private credit funds, % of shares
Fund investors asked to withdraw about twice what each fund allows in a quarter.
Morgan Stanley North Haven, Q1 2026
Morgan Stanley North Haven, Q3 2026
Dashed line marks the 5% quarterly limit
Source · fund disclosures reported by InvestmentNews and Bloomberg, March and September 20262
04 · Why Euroclear
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Euroclear has built infrastructure for young markets before, and in private credit its risk would be a defined budget.
- Euroclear has built post-trade infrastructure for markets that had yet to reach scale.
- Euroclear was founded in 1968 to settle Eurobonds, then a young market10. It later built the Collateral Highway, which held a daily average of €2.1 trillion in 20259.
- With private credit at $3 trillion and forecast to reach $5 trillion, another provider could take the operator role if Euroclear waits.
- If the platform underperformed, Euroclear would lose part of a defined Phase 1 budget. If it succeeded, Euroclear would run shared post-trade services for an asset class forecast to reach $5 trillion.
- Phase 1 would need a limited budget, because the partnership would reuse technology and licences that already exist.
- Euroclear, the first Eurobond settlement system, still holds that role more than fifty years later, alongside Clearstream.
- Private credit operations are likely to divide between platforms that managers build for their own funds and services open to every lender. Euroclear could run the second kind, because competing banks already use it.
- Venues owned by one group of banks have struggled to attract other dealers, because traders hesitate to send orders through a competitor.
- Banks that compete with one another have trusted Euroclear to hold their securities for more than five decades. A new entrant would need years to earn the same trust.
Section 03We propose four modules on Canton, built with Hydra X technology and licences
05 · Gaps and Modules
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Each missing service would become a module that extends a service Euroclear already runs at scale.
Hydra X would supply the technology, and its group's licences could cover each regulated activity in Singapore.
Four gaps, four modulesProposed
Each module would replace one bilateral process with a shared service, built on a Euroclear service and on Hydra X technology and licences.
| Today | Proposed module | Euroclear service it extends | Hydra X technology | Hydra X group licence, Singapore |
| Bilateral contractsEach facility agent keeps its own record of lenders | 1 · Digital Loan RegistryOne ownership record on Canton, with transfer controls, approved investors, lock-ups and clawbacks in each loan token | CustodyMore than €43 trillion held at the end of 20259 | Token Engine | Capital markets services (CMS) licenceCustody |
| Manual bookbuildingEach arranger keeps its own allocation record | 2 · Primary DistributionDigital bookbuilding, KYC once for each investor, allocations settled as loan tokens | FundsPlaceAlready distributes private credit funds from Ares and Franklin Templeton11 | Bookbuilding Engine | CMS licenceDealing |
| Bilateral tradesOutside any regulated venue, settled over weeks | 3 · Secondary TradingRequest for quote (RFQ) first, a central limit order book (CLOB) once terms standardise, atomic settlement | SettlementInternational securities settlement at Euroclear Bank | Matching Engine, Settlement Engine and Metra12 | RMO licenceHeld by AGX, the group's exchange4 |
| Notices sent lender by lenderNo audit trail shared by the syndicate | 4 · Custody, Settlement and Lifecycle ManagementSegregated accounts, one audited channel for amendments, waivers and payment notices | Asset servicingCorporate actions and income processing for the securities it holds | Custody Platform and Settlement EngineLifecycle workflow to be built in Phase 3 | CMS licenceCustody |
- Today lenders, arrangers and facility agents run each of these four processes bilaterally, one counterparty at a time. Each module would turn one of those processes into a shared service that every lender on the platform uses.
- Metra, Hydra X's settlement application on Canton, would settle each secondary trade atomically. The loan token and the cash would move in one indivisible transaction, so each trade would reach final settlement when it executes.
- Lifecycle automation would depend on borrowers agreeing to common documentation. Euroclear's relationships with arrangers and borrowers would therefore matter as much as the technology.
- Facility agents now send those notices to each lender separately, so the workflow would remove a manual step from every amendment.
06 · Reinforcing Modules
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Built in sequence, each module would bring users to the next and make the platform costly to leave.
- The Digital Loan Registry would give each loan one ownership record. With that record, Primary Distribution could confirm allocations on Canton, audit every transfer and place each position in regulated custody at allocation.
- Primary Distribution would onboard the investors that Secondary Trading needs. Every investor who takes an allocation would already have passed KYC and would hold a transferable loan token.
- Secondary Trading would bring the trades that make the lifecycle workflow in module 4 necessary. Each buyer would inherit the obligations attached to the loan and would need a way to service them.
- Once a syndicate sends its amendments and payment instructions through the lifecycle workflow, each member would have to rebuild those processes to leave. That cost would probably exceed any saving from moving to another provider.
How each module would bring users to the nextProposed
1Digital Loan RegistryOne ownership record for each loan
2Primary DistributionAllocations confirmed on Canton and placed in custody
Investors with KYC and loan tokens
3Secondary TradingBuyers inherit the obligations attached to each loan
4Lifecycle ManagementModule 4 workflow, with amendments and payments run through one channel
Cost of leavingEach syndicate member would have to rebuild its amendment and payment processes to move to another provider
07 · Hydra X
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Hydra X would supply the technology and the market operator licence that Euroclear would otherwise need to build or obtain.
Euroclear would choose the legal structure in its business case, using its own authorisations, the Hydra X licences or a mix of the two.
- Hydra X technology already covers issuance, distribution, trading, custody and settlement, so the partners could launch the first three modules quickly. The lifecycle workflow would be built during Phase 3.
- DBS distributes its tokenised structured notes through Hydra X, among other platforms13.
- The Hydra X group holds the Singapore licences for each regulated activity on the platform4.
- A capital markets services (CMS) licence from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) covers dealing, for primary distribution, and custody.
- AGX, the group's exchange, holds an RMO licence for secondary trading.
- These licences cover activity in Singapore. Activity in other jurisdictions would need local authorisation.
- Euroclear Bank's Singapore branch already holds a wholesale banking licence that covers dealing and custody14. It would still need a market operator licence to run the trading venue.
- Euroclear could run modules under its own authorisations or through a dedicated vehicle. The Hydra X licences could support either structure.
08 · Canton Network
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Canton's privacy model fits private credit, and both partners already work with Canton.
Lenders' and borrowers' privacy needs decide the choice of network.
- Private credit trading has three privacy requirements. Canton shows each transaction only to its parties, which would let the platform meet all three.
- 1. Other participants must be unable to see a lender's positions.
- 2. Each lender must control who learns its identity when it asks for quotes.
- 3. Prices must stay between the two counterparties until settlement.
- Canton also settles with deterministic finality and checks permissions on every asset.
- Public chains add privacy through separate applications built on top of the network. Private consortium chains offer privacy but connect poorly to institutions outside the consortium.
- Canton describes itself as the only public permissionless network built for institutional finance15.
- Euroclear has tested Canton and now helps to govern it.
- In a pilot completed in October 2024, 27 participants tokenised Gilts, Eurobonds and gold and used them as collateral in 500 atomic transactions16.
- Euroclear joined Canton's collateral working group in January 2026 and co-chairs the Canton Foundation with DTCC15.
- Euroclear, Clearstream and DTCC published a shared interoperability framework in February 2026 and plan operational pilots in 2026 and 202717.
- Hydra X has operated on Canton since 2024, with several firsts in the Asia-Pacific and one globally18.
- In August 2024 Hydra X became the first approved Canton validator in the region, meaning an operator approved to run Canton's network software.
- In November 2024 Hydra X became the region's first licensed custodian to hold Canton Coin. In April 2025 it launched the first tokenised structured product on Canton.
- In July 2025 it became the first operator outside Canton's Super Validators to run validators for other institutions as a service. Super Validators are the operators that run Canton's Global Synchronizer.
- In July 2026 it launched HX Gateway API, which lets institutions build on Canton without writing in Daml, Canton's programming language. By then Hydra X had tokenised over $100 million of assets on Canton.
09 · Asia-Pacific
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Asia-Pacific private credit is forecast to grow about 16% a year, and Euroclear has a licensed base in Singapore.
Forecasts cover the whole Asia-Pacific, because sources do not report Southeast Asia separately.
- Private credit in the Asia-Pacific is still small, and it is growing as banks share more lending with private credit funds.
- The Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) projects that Asia-Pacific private credit will grow from $59 billion in 2024 to $92 billion in 202719. Lenders in that market work across more than 50 jurisdictions.
- Southeast Asia needs about $210 billion of infrastructure investment a year to 2030, according to the Asian Development Bank20.
- Banks in the region syndicate loans on templates from the Asia Pacific Loan Market Association (APLMA)21. Private credit lenders there have no shared system for settlement or for recording ownership.
- Euroclear could extend its Asia-Pacific operations to private credit through the Singapore branch it already runs.
- In February 2025 Euroclear Bank opened a Singapore branch under a wholesale banking licence14. It had already appointed a chief executive for its Asia-Pacific markets and taken a stake in Marketnode, a Singapore digital market operator.
- We know of no neutral provider that offers post-trade services for private credit across the region. The first institution to build them could take that role.
- Institutions across the region already hold accounts at Euroclear or use Hydra X technology, so the partners could onboard them through relationships that exist today.
Section 04Euroclear could start the project with a commitment limited to Phase 1
10 · Three Phases
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
The partners could build the platform in three phases over 36 months, starting with technology and licences that exist today.
- In Phase 1, months 1 to 12, the partners would prove the Digital Loan Registry by tokenising a defined pool of loans with anchor institutions.
- In Phase 2, months 13 to 24, the partners would add Primary Distribution and Secondary Trading under the Hydra X group's RMO licence. Phase 2 would aim to show that fees recur and that trading grows as more investors join.
- In Phase 3, months 25 to 36, the partners would add CLOB trading for standardised loans, the full lifecycle workflow and a link to Euroclear's Collateral Highway.
- Euroclear would decide at the end of each phase whether to proceed, based on that phase's targets.
Three phases, each gated by a Euroclear decisionProposed
Phase 1 · Months 1 to 12Prove the registry
Modules added
Digital Loan Registry and custody for a defined pool of loans from anchor institutions
Targets
Transfers settle on T+1
Fee model agreed
Regulators confirm the treatment of loan tokens
Euroclear decision
Phase 2 · Months 13 to 24Prove that fees recur
Modules added
Primary Distribution, and Secondary Trading by RFQ under the Hydra X group's RMO licence
Targets
First primary issues closed
Ten or more institutions
$1 billion of secondary volume
Positive cash flow
Euroclear decision
Phase 3 · Months 25 to 36Build the network
Modules added
CLOB trading for standardised loans, the full lifecycle workflow and a link to the Collateral Highway
Targets
Thirty or more institutions
Loan tokens eligible as Collateral Highway collateral
Material contribution to Euroclear group income
11 · Fees and Returns
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Euroclear would commit a defined budget, and fee income would grow with each institution that joins.
Each phase would test the fee model at higher volume.
€43tn
Assets Euroclear held in custody at the end of 2025, under the custody model that the platform would extend to private credit9.
Euroclear · February 2026
- Our proposed platform would charge three fees, each of a kind the market already pays.
- 1. Lenders would pay a custody and registry fee on the notional value of the loans they hold.
- 2. Arrangers would pay issuance and allocation fees on primary volume.
- 3. Buyers and sellers would pay a transaction fee on each secondary trade.
- Three to five institutions placing $1 billion to $3 billion of loans in the registry would generate recurring custody fees.
- Secondary volume of $1 billion in Phase 2, at market-rate fees, could earn a return on the Phase 1 investment, depending on the budget Euroclear sets.
- Once the platform is built, each additional transaction would cost almost nothing to process. As more issuers join, investors on the platform would have more loans to choose from. Each new trade would also give lenders another price against which to value their holdings.
- Euroclear's core business works in the same way. In 2025 it earned nearly €1.9 billion of underlying business income at a business income operating margin of 26.2%9.
12 · Three Decisions
SummaryProblemWhy nowProposalDelivery
Three decisions would start the project, and Euroclear could reverse each before committing material capital.
- Euroclear would decide to pursue the project and commission a full Phase 1 business case within 60 days.
- Euroclear's business case would set out the capital requirement, a revenue model built on anchor institutions, and a plan for engaging regulators.
- Euroclear would approve a Phase 1 budget for technology integration, onboarding of pilot institutions and regulatory engagement.
- Euroclear's approval would cover Phase 1 only.
- Euroclear would engage Hydra X as its technology and licensing partner. The two firms would then open discussions on integration scope, licence arrangements and commercial terms.
Euroclear could take all three decisions at once, with its capital at risk capped at each stage.
13Private credit has grown large enough that its lack of shared post-trade infrastructure now adds to the risks that lenders and fund investors carry. The institution that builds it is likely to run it for decades, and we believe Euroclear should be that institution.